Opinion: Grade level transit like trams are better in most cases

Grade-level transit, like trams and light rail, offers clear advantages over subways when it comes to experiencing the city, natural light, and a more engaging journey. Being able to see your surroundings can enhance a sense of place, reduce stress, and make commuting feel less isolating. Studies have shown that access to daylight and views of nature can improve mental health, while long exposure to artificial lighting and enclosed spaces—like subways—can contribute to stress and fatigue.

From a societal perspective, an over-reliance on underground transit can feel dystopian, especially if it leads to cities being built primarily for cars on the surface while people are funneled underground. This can create a sense of disconnection from the urban environment. Cities that prioritize well-integrated surface transit with dedicated lanes and signal priority create more vibrant, human-centered spaces while maintaining efficiency.

That said, subways do have their place in extremely dense cities where surface space is too limited. But for most places, grade-level transit can be a healthier and more human-friendly choice.

This is my take, and I feel as if it is an unpopular take. I believe where we can we should invest more time and money into grade level transit especially trams. Zurich is an excellent example of what I think transit should be.