Do you ever think we'll get a confession from this case out of

Sarah Koenig, that her investigation was sloppy, and based on incomplete evidence, and that she got too close to her subject and allowed that to cloud her vision into obvious inconsistencies with his story.That she glossed over major stumbling blocks (Jenn, Jay's knowledge of the car, etc.) and mislead millions of people into believing that this was a complex story. That she went down several rabbit holes that ended up leading to nothing, but included them because they made it seem like there were mysteries when there weren't. That she wasn't nearly skeptical enough about Rabia. And that she enjoyed tremendous success and influenced a generation of copy-cats but that in retrospect it's really clear that her version of the events were no more correct than the prosecutors story, or what the jury ended up concluding