M6 II vs M200

Hello everyone!

The comparison may seem counterintuitive, but anyways.

I've been using the M100 for about 5 years for landscape and street photography, and shooting super short videos with it. After a while it just so happened that I had to sell the camera, and now I'm looking at what to buy to get back into shooting again.

I was almost completely happy with the M100 with two exceptions: it didn't shoot 4K and I couldn't charge it via Type C (the second is less important).

I plan to use the camera now for the following: - a lot of travel and outdoor photography (hiking, camping, etc) - short reels-like videos - horizontal static “talking head” videos, with handheld b-rolls of 5-10 seconds

Question — will I suffer when shooting 4K, and will the 4K quality be significantly worse on the M200, so do I need to overpay $150-200 for the M6 Mark II?

Also: I don't care about AF as I'm using manual lenses